↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
86 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009332.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi T Oladapo, Babasola O Okusanya, Edgardo Abalos, Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#412,226
of 17,956,456 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#898
of 11,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,282
of 384,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,956,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.