| Title |
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009332.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olufemi T Oladapo, Babasola O Okusanya, Edgardo Abalos, Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Panama | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 59% |
| Scientists | 15 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 129 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 137 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#861,689
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,677
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,735
of 435,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.