↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
81 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009332.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi T Oladapo, Babasola O Okusanya, Edgardo Abalos, Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Unspecified 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 62 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Unspecified 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 67 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#577,641
of 22,595,260 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,149
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,370
of 400,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,595,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.