↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
57 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009332.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi T Oladapo, Babasola O Okusanya, Edgardo Abalos, Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 248 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 9 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 152 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 160 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#960,833
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,764
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,795
of 438,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.