The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for the treatment of COVID‐19: a living network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013770 |
| Authors |
Isabelle Boutron, Anna Chaimani, Declan Devane, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gabriel Rada, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, David Tovey, Giacomo Grasselli, Philippe Ravaud |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 9 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,475,576
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,912
of 13,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,089
of 443,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.