↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003633.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipe B Rodrigues, Gonçalo S Duarte, Raquel E Marques, Mafalda Castelão, Joaquim Ferreira, Cristina Sampaio, Austen P Moore, João Costa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 20%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,358,264
of 17,977,824 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,575
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,011
of 383,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,977,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.