| Title |
Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013288.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Puntis, Amedeo Minichino, Franco De Crescenzo, Rachael Harrison, Andrea Cipriani, Belinda Lennox |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 38 | 16% |
| Psychology | 25 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 89 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,839,229
of 24,404,997 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,584
of 12,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,823
of 425,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,404,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.