| Title |
Massage for mechanical neck disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004871.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kinjal C Patel, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Charles H Goldsmith, Jeanette Ezzo, Annie Morien, Paul Michael J Peloso |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of mechanical neck disorders (MND) is known to be both a hindrance to individuals and costly to society. As such, massage is widely used as a form of treatment for MND. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 356 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 81 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 14% |
| Psychology | 17 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 97 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,123,301
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,421
of 12,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,296
of 171,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.