↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Massage for mechanical neck disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Massage for mechanical neck disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004871.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kinjal C Patel, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Charles H Goldsmith, Jeanette Ezzo, Annie Morien, Paul Michael J Peloso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 366 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 62 16%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Other 23 6%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 89 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 14%
Psychology 17 5%
Sports and Recreations 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 105 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,232,496
of 26,128,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,430
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,988
of 188,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,128,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.