↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009351.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy Klomp, Mireille van Poppel, Leanne Jones, Janine Lazet, Marcello Di Nisio, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

Many women would like to have a choice in pain relief during labour and also would like to avoid invasive methods of pain management in labour. Inhaled analgesia during labour involves the self-administered inhalation of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of agents while the mother remains awake and her protective laryngeal reflexes remain intact. Most of the agents are easy to administer, can be started in less than a minute and become effective within a minute.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 362 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 74 20%
Unknown 83 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 18%
Psychology 16 4%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 94 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#585,787
of 21,554,340 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,212
of 12,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,958
of 149,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,554,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.