↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009351.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy Klomp, Mireille van Poppel, Leanne Jones, Janine Lazet, Marcello Di Nisio, Antoine LM Lagro‐Janssen

Abstract

Many women would like to have a choice in pain relief during labour and also would like to avoid invasive methods of pain management in labour. Inhaled analgesia during labour involves the self-administered inhalation of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of agents while the mother remains awake and her protective laryngeal reflexes remain intact. Most of the agents are easy to administer, can be started in less than a minute and become effective within a minute.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 442 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 57 13%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 148 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 16%
Psychology 18 4%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 159 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#796,885
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,432
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,177
of 188,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.