| Title |
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013162.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony C James, Tessa Reardon, Angela Soler, Georgina James, Cathy Creswell |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 53 | 41% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 19% |
| Scientists | 25 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 643 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 12% |
| Researcher | 66 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 86 | 13% |
| Unknown | 246 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 177 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 61 | 9% |
| Unknown | 263 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#368,955
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#660
of 12,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,340
of 382,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.