↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Safety of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, including aspirin and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in people receiving methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Safety of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, including aspirin and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in people receiving methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, other spondyloarthritis)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008872.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra N Colebatch, Jonathan L Marks, Christopher J Edwards

Abstract

Methotrexate is routinely used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. There have been concerns regarding the safety of using concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin, or paracetamol (acetaminophen), or both, in these people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Other 12 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 73 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 7%
Psychology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 81 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,183,883
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,548
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,078
of 155,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.