↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Stewart, Melanie Dembinsky, Pauline Sobiesuo, Rohna Kearney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Unspecified 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 89 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Unspecified 11 6%
Psychology 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 95 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#601,556
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,165
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,882
of 505,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.