| Title |
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Stewart, Melanie Dembinsky, Pauline Sobiesuo, Rohna Kearney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 37% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 136 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 146 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#786,390
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,466
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,703
of 525,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.