↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Stewart, Melanie Dembinsky, Pauline Sobiesuo, Rohna Kearney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Psychology 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 24 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,174,309
of 18,219,870 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,963
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,263
of 427,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,219,870 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.