↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005613.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Semlitsch, Jennifer Engler, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Karl Horvath

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 77 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 84 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,793,257
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,474
of 12,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,385
of 417,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.