↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005613.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Semlitsch, Jennifer Engler, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Karl Horvath

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 63 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 68 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,825,796
of 22,415,795 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,289
of 12,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,994
of 401,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,415,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.