↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

(Ultra‐)long‐acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
(Ultra‐)long‐acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005613.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Semlitsch, Jennifer Engler, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Karl Horvath

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 103 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 110 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,473,134
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,184
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,443
of 439,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.