↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004900.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonçalo S Duarte, Filipe B Rodrigues, Raquel E Marques, Mafalda Castelão, Joaquim Ferreira, Cristina Sampaio, Austen P Moore, João Costa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 27 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,960,979
of 22,440,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,440
of 12,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,347
of 505,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,440,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.