↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004900.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonçalo S Duarte, Filipe B Rodrigues, Raquel E Marques, Mafalda Castelão, Joaquim Ferreira, Cristina Sampaio, Austen P Moore, João Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 64 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 67 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,583,752
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,186
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,654
of 527,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.