↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005656.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thanitsara Rittiphairoj, Tahreem A Mir, Tianjing Li, Gianni Virgili

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,743,411
of 21,017,702 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,786
of 12,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,312
of 492,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,017,702 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.