↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short‐term late‐generation antibiotics versus longer term penicillin for acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Short‐term late‐generation antibiotics versus longer term penicillin for acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004872.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saleh Altamimi, Adli Khalil, Khalid A Khalaiwi, Ruth A Milner, Martin V Pusic, Mohammed A Al Othman

Abstract

The standard duration of treatment for children with acute group A beta hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis with oral penicillin is 10 days. Shorter duration antibiotics may have comparable efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 271 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Other 27 10%
Student > Master 27 10%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 87 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 95 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#640,450
of 26,411,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,081
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,159
of 188,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.