↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Black cohosh (Cimicifugaspp.) for menopausal symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
Title
Black cohosh (Cimicifugaspp.) for menopausal symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007244.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Leach, Vivienne Moore

Abstract

Menopause can be a distressing and disruptive time for many women, with many experiencing hot flushes, night sweats, vaginal atrophy and dryness. Postmenopausal women are also at increased risk of osteoporosis. Interventions that decrease the severity and frequency of these menopausal symptoms are likely to improve a woman's well-being and quality of life. Hormone therapy has been shown to be effective in controlling the symptoms of menopause; however, many potentially serious adverse effects have been associated with this treatment. Evidence from experimental studies suggests that black cohosh may be a biologically plausible alternative treatment for menopause; even so, findings from studies investigating the clinical effectiveness of black cohosh have, to date, been inconsistent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 331 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 17%
Student > Master 45 13%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 95 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 101 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#310,720
of 21,667,499 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#569
of 12,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,438
of 149,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,667,499 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.