↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005014.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Kendrick, Ben Young, Amanda J Mason‐Jones, Nohaid Ilyas, Felix A Achana, Nicola J Cooper, Stephanie J Hubbard, Alex J Sutton, Sherie Smith, Persephone Wynn, Caroline A Mulvaney, Michael C Watson, Carol Coupland

Abstract

In industrialised countries injuries (including burns, poisoning or drowning) are the leading cause of childhood death and steep social gradients exist in child injury mortality and morbidity. The majority of injuries in pre-school children occur at home but there is little meta-analytic evidence that child home safety interventions reduce injury rates or improve a range of safety practices, and little evidence on their effect by social group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 233 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 53 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Psychology 14 6%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,333,750
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,858
of 12,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,660
of 180,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.