↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterotonic agents for first-line treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Uterotonic agents for first-line treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012754.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R Parry Smith, Argyro Papadopoulou, Eleanor Thomas, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Shireen Meher, Zarko Alfirevic, Andrew D Weeks, G Justus Hofmeyr, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Mariana Widmer, Olufemi T Oladapo, Joshua P Vogel, Fernando Althabe, Arri Coomarasamy, Ioannis D Gallos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Unspecified 13 9%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 61 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 30%
Unspecified 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 63 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#646,131
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,293
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,253
of 504,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.