↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterotonic agents for first‐line treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Uterotonic agents for first‐line treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012754.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R Parry Smith, Argyro Papadopoulou, Eleanor Thomas, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Shireen Meher, Zarko Alfirevic, Andrew D Weeks, G Justus Hofmeyr, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Mariana Widmer, Olufemi T Oladapo, Joshua P Vogel, Fernando Althabe, Arri Coomarasamy, Ioannis D Gallos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 15 7%
Unspecified 14 6%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 104 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Unspecified 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 107 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#916,105
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,792
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,440
of 526,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.