↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006768.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell Scheiman, Marjean T Kulp, Susan A Cotter, John G Lawrenson, Lin Wang, Tianjing Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Professor 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 38 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 45 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,053,263
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,498
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,981
of 509,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.