| Title |
Interventions for itch in people with advanced chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011393.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Hercz, Simon H Jiang, Angela C Webster |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#737,755
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,440
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,845
of 517,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.