↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick A Fee, Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 19 11%
Unspecified 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 6 3%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 75 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 35%
Unspecified 14 8%
Psychology 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 80 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,702,733
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,641
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,340
of 518,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.