↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick A Fee, Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 27%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,302,013
of 18,772,620 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,241
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,415
of 439,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,772,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.