The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Maternal dietary antigen avoidance during pregnancy or lactation, or both, for preventing or treating atopic disease in the child
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000133.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael S Kramer, Ritsuko Kakuma |
| Abstract |
Some breastfed infants with atopic eczema benefit from elimination of cow milk, egg, or other antigens from their mother's diet. Maternal dietary antigens are also known to cross the placenta. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Madagascar | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 111 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 122 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,273,041
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,556
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,574
of 188,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.