↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Patrick A Fee, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 58 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 65 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,456,514
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,116
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,883
of 525,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.