↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Patrick A Fee, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 38 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 42 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,240,173
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,866
of 12,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,990
of 503,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.