↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007561.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidde Jongsma, Joost Bekken, Ninos Ayez, Cornelis J Hoogewerf, Vincent Van Weel, Bram Fioole

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,812,571
of 19,695,594 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,036
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,317
of 472,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,695,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.