| Title |
Early treatment versus expectant management of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus for preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013278.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Souvik Mitra, Alexandra Scrivens, Adelaide M von Kursell, Tim Disher |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,194,651
of 24,273,038 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,627
of 12,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,200
of 516,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,273,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.