↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
361 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinglan Mu, Andrea D Furlan, Wai Yee Lam, Marcos Y Hsu, Zhipeng Ning, Lixing Lao

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 361 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 368 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 51 14%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Other 23 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 3%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 146 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 17%
Unspecified 51 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 13%
Psychology 10 3%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 154 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 308. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#105,113
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,080
of 518,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.