↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
351 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinglan Mu, Andrea D Furlan, Wai Yee Lam, Marcos Y Hsu, Zhipeng Ning, Lixing Lao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 351 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Other 12 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 121 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 15%
Psychology 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 129 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#102,277
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 12,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,158
of 508,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.