↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Relaxation therapy for preventing and treating preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Relaxation therapy for preventing and treating preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007426.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bussarin Khianman, Porjai Pattanittum, Jadsada Thinkhamrop, Pisake Lumbiganon

Abstract

Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Although the pathogenesis of preterm labour (PTL) is not well understood, there is evidence about the relationship between maternal psychological stress and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Relaxation or mind-body therapies cover a broad range of techniques, e.g. meditation, massage, etc. There is no systematic review investigating the effect of relaxation techniques on preventing PTL and PTB. This review does not cover hypnosis as this is the subject of a separate Cochrane review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 20%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 24%
Psychology 40 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,656,879
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,976
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,726
of 127,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.