↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011545.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarie F Fransen, Joost van de Ven, Franyke R Banga, Ben Willem J Mol, S Guid Oei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 44 20%
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 55 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 44 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 18%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 62 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,196,562
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,700
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,333
of 503,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.