Title |
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013812 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shari Krishnaratne, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Michaela Coenen, Karin Geffert, Caroline Jung-Sievers, Carmen Klinger, Suzie Kratzer, Hannah Littlecott, Ani Movsisyan, Julia E Rabe, Eva Rehfuess, Kerstin Sell, Brigitte Strahwald, Jan M Stratil, Stephan Voss, Katharina Wabnitz, Jacob Burns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
Germany | 4 | 8% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 31 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 40 | 75% |
Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
Researcher | 29 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Other | 33 | 11% |
Unknown | 128 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Other | 48 | 16% |
Unknown | 137 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#822,116
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,564
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,958
of 512,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.