↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006112.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Stanford, Harrigan Ryan, Arturo Solis-Moya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 84 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Unspecified 30 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 85 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,116,748
of 21,735,696 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,420
of 12,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,811
of 488,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,735,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.