↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006112.pub5
Authors

Gemma Stanford, Harrigan Ryan, Arturo Solis-Moya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Master 10 21%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 21%
Unspecified 5 10%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,672,209
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,167
of 11,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,266
of 409,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.