↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Labour assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Labour assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leeanne Lauzon, Ellen D Hodnett

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 19%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,228,487
of 16,418,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,929
of 11,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,138
of 206,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,418,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.