↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

5-ASA for management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
5-ASA for management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010101
Authors

Flloyd Carter, Marroon Thabane, Majd Alsayb, John K Marshall

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,241,554
of 16,446,638 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,951
of 11,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,980
of 207,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,446,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.