↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moshe Vardi, Eyal Jacobson, Asaph Nini, Haim Bitterman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 25%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 33 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,618,073
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,111
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,659
of 392,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.