↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moshe Vardi, Eyal Jacobson, Asaph Nini, Haim Bitterman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,515,245
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,605
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,542
of 96,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.