↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012913.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Carmel M Hawley, Yeoungjee Cho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 31 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 34 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,719,995
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,571
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,825
of 506,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.