↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012913.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Carmel M Hawley, Yeoungjee Cho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Psychology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,687,651
of 19,275,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,892
of 11,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,244
of 451,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,275,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.