The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011119.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tony Kendrick, Magdy El‐Gohary, Beth Stuart, Simon Gilbody, Rachel Churchill, Laura Aiken, Abhishek Bhattacharya, Amy Gimson, Anna L Brütt, Kim de Jong, Michael Moore |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
| Norway | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 646 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 645 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 15% |
| Researcher | 73 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 16% |
| Unknown | 214 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 18% |
| Psychology | 115 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 244 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,460,144
of 26,362,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,928
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,099
of 373,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.