↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
139 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
536 Mendeley
Title
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008367.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tingting Zhao, Xinyu Wu, Qi Zhang, Chunjie Li, Helen V Worthington, Fang Hua

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 536 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 58 11%
Other 28 5%
Researcher 27 5%
Student > Postgraduate 22 4%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 271 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 13%
Unspecified 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 1%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 286 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#332,559
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#557
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,436
of 528,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.