↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

de Souza RF, Travess H, Newton T, Marchesan MA, de Souza, Raphael Freitas, Travess, Helen, Newton, Tim, Marchesan, Melissa A

Abstract

Teeth that have suffered trauma can fuse to the surrounding bone - the process referred to as dental ankylosis. Ankylosed permanent front teeth fail to erupt during facial growth and can become displaced, thus resulting in functional and aesthetic problems. Dental ankylosis is also associated with root resorption, which eventually leads to the loss of affected teeth. Different interventions for the management of ankylosed permanent front teeth have been described but it is unclear which are the most effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,328,179
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,571
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,117
of 172,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.