| Title |
Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005199.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven R Brown, Jim Tiernan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 58 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,178,729
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,972
of 12,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,958
of 59,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.