↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005199.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R Brown, Jim Tiernan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 63 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 73 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#16,640,335
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,358
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,703
of 70,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.