The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005199.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven R Brown, Jim Tiernan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 73 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,416,450
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,488
of 13,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,070
of 72,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.