↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001211.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aziz Sheikh, Brian Hurwitz, Constant Paul van Schayck, Susannah McLean, Ulugbek Nurmatov

Abstract

Acute bacterial conjunctivitis is an infection of the conjunctiva. Both the palpebral and the bulbar ocular conjunctival surfaces are usually affected and typically become red and inflamed. Antibiotic therapy is widely used for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. This Cochrane Review was first published in The Cochrane Library in 1999; updated in 2006 and again in 2012.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 286 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 70 24%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Master 32 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 59 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 65 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#474,889
of 21,421,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#948
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,422
of 153,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,421,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.