↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001211.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aziz Sheikh, Brian Hurwitz, Constant Paul van Schayck, Susannah McLean, Ulugbek Nurmatov

Abstract

Acute bacterial conjunctivitis is an infection of the conjunctiva. Both the palpebral and the bulbar ocular conjunctival surfaces are usually affected and typically become red and inflamed. Antibiotic therapy is widely used for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. This Cochrane Review was first published in The Cochrane Library in 1999; updated in 2006 and again in 2012.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 247 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 69 28%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Master 29 12%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 44 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#407,524
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#878
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,341
of 145,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.