The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prophylactic antibiotics for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013198.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sadia Janjua, Alexander G Mathioudakis, Rebecca Fortescue, Ruth Ae Walker, Sahar Sharif, Christopher Jd Threapleton, Sofia Dias |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,620,364
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,328
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,059
of 550,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 550,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.