↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011865.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liying Jia, Qingyue Meng, Anthony Scott, Beibei Yuan, Lu Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 53 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 64 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,288,603
of 22,158,490 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,007
of 12,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,152
of 426,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,158,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.