↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical treatments for cutaneous warts

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
535 Mendeley
Title
Topical treatments for cutaneous warts
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001781.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Shing Kwok, Sam Gibbs, Cathy Bennett, Richard Holland, Rachel Abbott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 525 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Student > Master 60 11%
Researcher 58 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 7%
Other 117 22%
Unknown 161 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 210 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Psychology 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 180 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#392,355
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#645
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,888
of 188,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.