↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical treatments for cutaneous warts

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
Title
Topical treatments for cutaneous warts
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001781.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Shing Kwok, Sam Gibbs, Cathy Bennett, Richard Holland, Rachel Abbott

Abstract

Viral warts are a common skin condition, which can range in severity from a minor nuisance that resolve spontaneously to a troublesome, chronic condition. Many different topical treatments are available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 360 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 14%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Other 97 26%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 186 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Psychology 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 73 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#417,204
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#930
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,491
of 142,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.