| Title |
Separate care for new mother and infant versus rooming-in for increasing the duration of breastfeeding.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006641.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaafar SH, Lee KS, Ho JJ |
| Abstract |
Separate care for a new mother and infant may affect the duration of breastfeeding, breastfeeding behaviour and may have an adverse effect on neonatal and maternal outcomes. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,134,741
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,594
of 12,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,951
of 168,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.