↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002783.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathryn Broderick, Lorna Watson, Matthew P Armon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 8 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 86 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 97 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,401,978
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,900
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,122
of 523,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.