↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002783.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathryn Broderick, Lorna Watson, Matthew P Armon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Unspecified 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 47 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Unspecified 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 57 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,554,248
of 22,464,753 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,438
of 12,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,182
of 428,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,464,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.