Title |
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011184.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tjitske Zaat, Miriam Zagers, Femke Mol, Mariëtte Goddijn, Madelon van Wely, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 22 | 9% |
Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
Researcher | 16 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 126 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 139 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,340,301
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,823
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,208
of 537,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.