↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011184.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjitske Zaat, Miriam Zagers, Femke Mol, Mariëtte Goddijn, Madelon van Wely, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,670,797
of 19,149,304 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,966
of 11,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,434
of 376,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,149,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.