↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
618 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000978.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, Gemma Bryan, Susan Furness, Anne-Marie Glenny, Anne Littlewood, Martin G McCabe, Stefan Meyer, Tasneem Khalid, Philip Riley

Abstract

Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent them. One of these side effects is oral mucositis (mouth ulcers).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 611 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 17%
Student > Bachelor 76 12%
Researcher 64 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 8%
Student > Postgraduate 44 7%
Other 124 20%
Unknown 156 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 279 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 170 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,455,170
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,110
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,739
of 120,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.