| Title |
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ABeta42 for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia in participants diagnosed with any dementia subtype in a specialist care setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010945.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Kokkinou, Lucy C Beishon, Nadja Smailagic, Anna H Noel-Storr, Chris Hyde, Obioha Ukoumunne, Rosemary E Worrall, Anja Hayen, Meera Desai, Abhishekh Hulegar Ashok, Eleanor J Paul, Aikaterini Georgopoulou, Tiziana Casoli, Terry J Quinn, Craig W Ritchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 53% |
| France | 2 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 25% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 113 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,468,019
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,172
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,308
of 549,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 549,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.