↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low‐back pain and sciatica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low‐back pain and sciatica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007612.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Thuve Dahm, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 319 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 18%
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 77 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Psychology 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 92 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#513,326
of 26,156,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#857
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,198
of 99,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,156,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.