↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007612.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Thuve Dahm, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 311 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 19%
Student > Master 49 16%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 73 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 16%
Psychology 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 89 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#457,828
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#825
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#990
of 86,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.