| Title |
Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013705.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Sarah Berhane, Melissa Taylor, Ada Adriano, Clare Davenport, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jane Cunningham, Sophie Beese, Julie Domen, Janine Dretzke, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Isobel M Harris, Malcolm J Price, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Lotty Hooft, Mariska MG Leeflang, Matthew DF McInnes, René Spijker, Ann Van den Bruel, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,721 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 223 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 142 | 5% |
| Japan | 140 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 104 | 4% |
| Canada | 76 | 3% |
| Poland | 62 | 2% |
| Spain | 54 | 2% |
| Germany | 47 | 2% |
| Ireland | 42 | 2% |
| Other | 289 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1542 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2452 | 90% |
| Scientists | 128 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 109 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 32 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 755 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 115 | 15% |
| Unknown | 326 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 154 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 112 | 15% |
| Unknown | 359 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3891. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,318
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85
of 457,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.