@real_seeking @justin_hart @rationalground For the record: https://t.co/EW9v9VoErr
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Ivermectin does not work. It's time to let it go. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC https:/…
@AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Ivermectin does not work. It's time to let it go. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC https://t.co/CckfB86csn https://t.co/jxTy0A2fjL https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/Vx9fGEmjT2
@6Gavyn6 @CNN Russiagate was never a hoax Trump was a Russian asset Ivermectin has proven no benefit for COVID and it is a horse dewormer https://t.co/GhmtxQ3Rdx Man who gave FBI Hunters laptop says has seen disinfo online https://t.co/EijvhbPfEt
@ricwe123 NCBI found Ivermectin "has no beneficial effect for people with COVID‐19" https://t.co/GhmtxQ3Rdx NCBI found "CBD can block SARS-CoV-2 infection" And "administration is associated with a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans" https://t
@FightnIrishMike @maxfawcett Analyses later on revealed that the evidence was low-quality and it is unclear if it has a meaningful effect https://t.co/GdGfOtIAkC
@D04467246 @maxfawcett From the Cochrane Collaboration https://t.co/GdGfOtIAkC "For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high‐certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID‐19. Based on the very low‐certainty evidence
@bzblues1 @Inugamiz @Rosemary_426 @JacksonGilder @TheJoeyMama @DCPoliceDept "we are still uncertain whether ivermectin prevents death or clinical worsening or increases serious adverse events, while there is low-certainty evidence that it has no beneficial
@bzblues1 @Rosemary_426 @Inugamiz @JacksonGilder @TheJoeyMama @DCPoliceDept I get it, you're BPD. "there is currently high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19" https://t.co/0LxW1TXjdO #j6 #TreasonHasConsequ
@NinelivesM @AussieBotStudio I can wave pubmed articles around too. https://t.co/pAdoAWSHDD https://t.co/FPBlHpFBDE
@VigilantFox @Plandemic3Movie Quite a large number of trials have now been done and from what I can see almost all say not affective against covid 19. I.e patients had same results/outcome as those on placebo. Here's 2: https://t.co/6fIszfuVmx… https:/
@bruno_mousse @AlexSofamous @Marie854451121 Si tu veux l'état de l'art sur la science c'est ici https://t.co/HmvOoCGh4D https://t.co/g1ObD2YuDj
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr The failures of HCQ + ivermectin are not some pro-vaccine conspiracy cooked up by Fauci.…
@tadesouaiaia @zeynep This was the cochrane review for Ivermectin. It would be incorrect to conclude from this that it has a benefit in terms of mortality. https://t.co/4h98D7Q5JP https://t.co/6Xe6w8dfZG
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2022 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/Du3PmbqmQr
RT @AndyMCollings: @goddeketal Why use an anonymous, deeply-flawed meta-analysis on a shady website, when there's a Cochrane Library System…
@goddeketal Why use an anonymous, deeply-flawed meta-analysis on a shady website, when there's a Cochrane Library Systematic Review readily available?! https://t.co/b7gTfg4lVs
@DrEvil2003 @LeadingReport Assert? More like document, not assert, but.. https://t.co/kWuy2u1H0s
@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr The failures of HCQ + ivermectin are not some pro-vaccine conspiracy cooked up by Fauci. It's a conclusion supported by published evidence from numerous researchers across the world. So feel free to drop the asinine conspira
😂😂😂😂😂🤢🤮
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox @drpaulmarik1 Safe, and it still doesn't work for covid https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co/03RVAIFppC ht…
RT @rt7683: @SamuelFontanez2 @VigilantFox @RealBenCarson Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have shown no efficacy for COVID-19 based on ran…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox @drpaulmarik1 Safe, and it still doesn't work for covid https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co/03RVAIFppC ht…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox @drpaulmarik1 Safe, and it still doesn't work for covid https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co/03RVAIFppC ht…
RT @jason_willz1: @LettersFromOz @RobynGalah We have actual randomized controlled trials proving ivermectin doesn't work for covid. https:…
@r_y_a_n__t Re: "Like I said before - time will tell. Perhaps we wager ? How about - loser deletes account?" Why does your account still exist? https://t.co/jxTy0A2fjL https://t.co/cvtgCJBLQs https://t.co/KXNkmsWb2n https://t.co/QIWs7PCfYy https://t.co/
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "Like I said before - time will tell. Perhaps we wager ? How abo…
@r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "Like I said before - time will tell. Perhaps we wager ? How about - loser deletes account?" Delete your account. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/3k1OBIcdQV
RT @cjf50: @spiritb2 @JRW_Fitness @jason1973bob @BenKentish It’s based on this Cochrane review https://t.co/VsRMbw6uLa
@spiritb2 @JRW_Fitness @jason1973bob @BenKentish It’s based on this Cochrane review https://t.co/VsRMbw6uLa
@AndyMLinn And you're right back to your fascination with "females penises". Let me know when you're not so willfully ignorant on evidence regarding the topics you fabricate about. Because your paranoia is not a substitute for knowledge 😉 https://t.co/fy
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox @jimmy_dore Drugs do not win Nobel prizes, people do. And the Noble Prize was for scientists and their work…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox @jimmy_dore Drugs do not win Nobel prizes, people do. And the Noble Prize was for scientists and their work…
2022年6月 コクランレビュー更新 イベルメクチンが SARS-CoV-2 感染を予防するという証拠はありません。この更新では、より多くの参加者を含むより質の高い試験を通じて、エビデンスの確実性が向上しました。 https://t.co/xLYrNDCL8z
@TechTuber1 @Bradybits @boulware_dr Feel free to look up what a "meta-analysis" is https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/OZsN0AmIwe https://t.co/ukWQRzZe2j https://t.co/bliHYWD0Xv https://t.co/rsqn9ldAWe
@ThriveMovement @AlexBerenson That's not what the Cochrane review says. Read the authors' conclusions for yourself. https://t.co/b7gTfg4lVs
RT @rt7683: @billdubs @ReOpenChris @SMHCS if he thinks ivermectin works for covid he has no business treating patients and doesn't care abo…
@balu_sastry @MumbaichaDon Efficacy of IVM is not a matter of debate. It is a matter of data. All meta-analyses in the last year are negative. It does not work. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm
@_RickConnor @DrEliDavid I'd advise you to stop trolling, contrarian conspiracist. Your unverified anecdotes, garbage websites like ivmmeta / c19ivm, etc. don't change reality of the published evidence on COVID-19 treatments. https://t.co/vanvDcjLmL http
@drtaubraun @boulware_dr Sorry, but what you wrote sounds like gibberish, mixing terms from neuromuscular physiology into immunology, misleading non-exerts. Dexamethasone, unlike IVM, worked before + after widespread vaccination. So no more excuses. http
C'est tout le contraire de la revue Cochrane sur l'ivermectine: https://t.co/FIGpdEj5FM Le protocole a été écrit après la publication des résultats des premiers essais cliniques, c'est donc un protocole rétrospectif. 3/n
@Lerianis1 @TigerlillySusan @PierreKory Your "numerous doctors" line fails in the face of numerous studies showing ivermectin doesn't work, to the point that medical organizations (which include "numerous doctors") recommend against its use. https://t.co/
@AizeLauna https://t.co/P2yZFysYBH Ça c'est une grosse publication que vous pouvez lire et étudier avec les sources.
@P_McCulloughMD @jimmy_dore @SMHCS @AAPSonline Meanwhile... "The molecular hypothesis of ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) replication in early stages of inf
@EarthlingSK @TigerlillySusan @PierreKory And? At least they properly disclosed COIs, unlike Kory + other ivermectin promoters. The COI disclosures don't change the results, which are consistent with plenty of other studies on ivermectin not working. ht
@cryptohnitas @centinel5051 Mira, aquí otro "link del gobierno USA", más reciente que el tuyo, que dice que la ivermectina NO es efectiva https://t.co/ruKzNJzZVs Si es que no os dais ni cuenta de que realmente los payasos e ignorantes sois vosotros, hahaha
que no tiene ningún efecto beneficioso para las personas con COVID-19. https://t.co/zggTes6Fhj
@Zigganaut @joeyjojojunior_ @Realstyleshrink @ABridgen Here's a comprehensive, systematic review of the RCTs. https://t.co/4mtScVyHo3
@NickdeCusa @MichaelPSenger Hill was correct. Below are 6 more recent ivermectin meta-analyses, all negative. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm https://t.co/NFKlFNdG0L
This is the Cochrane review: https://t.co/2bmr3ul12H
@Claude__Cat @RemnantMd @jason_willz1 @JeromeAdamsMD They're probably grifting. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/vsVuUQJUBo https://t.co/bof2dMV3VF
RT @PhillyPharmaBoy: @SConwaySmith @Veritatem2021 No, all of the meta-analyses done last year conclude ivermectin is not active against COV…
@SConwaySmith @Veritatem2021 No, all of the meta-analyses done last year conclude ivermectin is not active against COVID. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm https://t.co/N
@Stutzmanclan @schapdelaine @Baconguy5678 @KC24051027 @DrEliDavid Below are the more recent ivermectin meta-analyses. All negative. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm http
@DaveW22112081 @DonnaSlaybaugh @MidwesternDoc @JesslovesMJK FirstNameBunchOfNumbers, there are plenty of non-grifting doctors who do not make money off of deceiving patients about whether failed treatments like ivermectin work. Kory, unfortunately, is not
@DocteurPEB1 https://t.co/s92ZWmP0aU https://t.co/FX4waNX0c9 https://t.co/KxOGxQVRNF Voila un échantillon de ce qui est factuel !
@insins31544458 @Psycharyc @Berty76 @TroncheBiais https://t.co/s92ZWmP0aU Ce qui s'affirme sans preuve peut-être nié sans preuve. ... Authors' conclusions : No evidence is available on ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.
@Picocomero @MonkEmma @lawrie_dr Here you go. https://t.co/AYgJGtVLt6 A review of all RCTs that meet the Cochrane criteria. No proven efficacy. I'll presume Emma, like I has no intention of replying to more bad faith questions on vaccines.
Si, comme pour les masques en tissu, on commence à mettre en avant les efficacités non statistiquement significatives Alors à ce compte là l'ivermectine réduit la mortalité toutes causes confondues de 23% selon @cochranecollab Double standard https://t
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @themattdimitri Sensibly answer the published evidence on topics you made claims about, such as ivermectin + pathogen origins. And "sensibly answer" does not mean daft + baseless conspiracism about experts in those topics. http
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @themattdimitri Re: "I said I accept the Ivermectin studies." Which again illustrates how you failed in your ideologically-motivated + paranoid objections to experts who knew more than you. They got ivermectin right. You didn't
@WybrenvanHaga @ArtsenC De feiten over het door jou gepromoot Ivermectine. 1 van de vele leugens die je verspreid. https://t.co/hgMCizjJ4Q
@GUstaoset @imnotfromthegov @VPrasadMDMPH @Sensible__Med Studies with “low risk of bias” find a null effect for IVM. Also, there is many studies that have been done since published in reputable journals—null effects for IVM on mortality. https://t.co/bU3S
@Chas0807 @tangot296 BTW, the analysis you posted is for viral pneumonia (COVID), not bacterial pneumonia. Below are 6 negative meta-analyses for ivermectin. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y ht
@AzuMart17854779
@focusingman On the other hand, the 6 most recent meta-analyses indicate ivermectin is without meaningful benefit. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm https://t.co/NFKlFNdG
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
Cochrane Covid
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
RT @centinel5051: Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin…
Cochrane reviews about covid19 interventions effectiveness: Masks, no evidence https://t.co/cizGPLpTUF Ivermectin, no evidence https://t.co/H03p9JnmM1 Vitamin D, no evidence https://t.co/KczAKHSsbI Vaccines: Solid evidence preventing severe disease https:/
Revisiones Cochrane eficacia intervenciones covid19: Mascarillas: Sin evidencia https://t.co/mttvlbCXbA Ivermectina: Sin evidencia https://t.co/eWFC9i4RYc Vitamina D: Sin evidencia https://t.co/KczAKHSsbI Vacunas: Evidencia sólida contra enfermedad grave h
@JoshWalkos @tweetwithJete @sqeptiqa @AlexBerenson @Twitter @jack @PierreKory @stkirsch @P_McCulloughMD @PeterHotez @CDCDirector Below are the most recent credible meta-analyses of IVM; all negative. These analyses are imperfect but of higher quality than
@sudokuvariante @VPrasadMDMPH Six ivermectin meta-analyses in the last year conclude the same: no meaningful beneficial effect against COVID. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2p
@HKIunvkAuTBvBic @yasu202109 @Ecccm2Ecccm @kazuchancocone @hikkimania @maiti_86 @seigakusou0628 その論文とやら大分取り下げられたりしてるんですがねぇ。あとメタ解析になりますが有益性を示せてない論文はこちら。NCCCMさんもいってますが効くってデータちゃんとあるなら医師も使うし承認もでるんですよ。使わないってことはそういうデータに乏しいってこと https://t.co/nxxL459Ju6
RT @Cochrane_DE: Das Parasitenmittel Ivermectin wurde von Manchen zum Wundermittel gegen COVID hochstilisiert. Die dritte Fassung dieses Re…
@Geirhanss1 @DryCappucinno @Johnincarlisle Links to the 6 most recent meta-analyses on ivermectin are below. All negative. https://t.co/wQoUuON36k https://t.co/9vY7sC5o30 https://t.co/5VBOc3Fb31 https://t.co/KgMA4RjY8y https://t.co/0rb2pvjUJm https://t.co/
RT @Cochrane_DE: Das Parasitenmittel Ivermectin wurde von Manchen zum Wundermittel gegen COVID hochstilisiert. Die dritte Fassung dieses Re…
RT @Cochrane_DE: Das Parasitenmittel Ivermectin wurde von Manchen zum Wundermittel gegen COVID hochstilisiert. Die dritte Fassung dieses Re…
@Castdeath97 @weleesewodewick @egyptiankinghk @sid8998 They claim ivermectin works. Seems like a common thing for a lot of vaccine denialists. 🤦♂️ https://t.co/oka98L7oqN https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/bjMAXSRVfq