@Boggleface @Covid19Critical @FreeWCH "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID‐19 or preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infection." https://t.co/yemEtxsdiA
@aspiesmomma How is it a straw man to point out that the study you cherry- picked is inconclusive and preliminary? This study in PubMed is way more in line with the general scientific consensus. https://t.co/QiPjxxNxBR
RT @rt7683: @DarthCez @EdKrassen @Timcast Randomized controlled trials show ivermectin has no efficacy for covid. https://t.co/81N0hIL3Fd…
RT @WideRangeThink: (6/18) 2022年6月のコクランレビューでも効果なし。 https://t.co/UegI7qPGZ7 この後に公表された興和の治験での主要評価項目の統計的有意差なし。 https://t.co/c9g7BQhmtZ 公表までに長時…
(6/18) 2022年6月のコクランレビューでも効果なし。 https://t.co/UegI7qPGZ7 この後に公表された興和の治験での主要評価項目の統計的有意差なし。 https://t.co/c9g7BQhmtZ 公表までに長時間を要した北里大学の治験も効果なし。 https://t.co/FUImpIPx6h 効果を裏付ける根拠は皆無
@marc_g_wathelet @K_G_Andersen Cool story, bro. Published evidence shows what it shows, no matter how much you pretend otherwise by citing a garbage blog like ivmmeta. Same point for when a flat Earther cites an anonymous, non-peer-reviewed flat Earther b
@Lucky7Paul @djchicus @Truth_in_Number And perhaps you should read the Cochrane meta-study of the best trials. https://t.co/9t42sM6kEt
@Lucky7Paul @djchicus @Truth_in_Number This has nothing to do with Fauci, you twit. It’s the Cochrane library. Do you not know what the Nat. Library of Medicine is? Not know what the National Institutes of Health are? Do you not know that Fauci is not head
@djchicus @Truth_in_Number The problem with ivermectin is, there’s no way can work. Antivirals need to work on the dish before they work in the animal, and ivermectin does not inhibit coronavirus replication at any dose that an animal control rate. The bes
@Mellow01673379 @attjekuiken @PvdA 🤦. Het heeft niet gewerkt en werkt nog steeds niet. https://t.co/BATxJMyrlv
@ASKA_Pop_ASKA それで「イベルメクチンはコロナには効かないが後遺症には効く」と言いたいのですか?話がおかしくないですか。 フランスの治験でも日本と同じく有効性は認められなかった。 治療方法は日本と変わらない。 コクランライブラリ https://t.co/Jea0TmHrmr フランスの厚労省 https://t.co/iyZKfrmbdz
@JacqjeD70 @HartvNL Zegt helemaal niks. Gaat om de hoeveelheid personen die zijn onderzocht. Tien onderzoeken op 5 personen zegt niks in vergelijking met 1 onderzoek bij 10.000 personen https://t.co/BATxJMyZb3
@ThomeCampo @tagesschau https://t.co/NrDpEBzZGG Lesen bildet.
@MiBec8 @Thomas_Banacek @jonathanstea Helicopters are versatile. Should we use them to do the laundry? https://t.co/WcYthsF5Iv
@Thomas_Banacek @MiBec8 @jonathanstea Has been addressed repeatedly. Not by words but through clinical trials. https://t.co/MMzOmoYwJJ
RT @rt7683: @JihanThomas @russdaniels303 @AmyEgan07657512 @VisagieShirley @JunaHazee @cawstanley @MikeMiers9 @AbbieM16 1) holistic medicine…
RT @jason_willz1: Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of efficacy for COVID-19 https://t.c…
@Medical_Nemesis @AngryCardio If I wanted an echo chamber, I wouldn't be on Twitter dealing with willfully uninformed folks like you 🙂 Your problem is you deal in vague ideological platitudes, not evidence. Dealing in evidence reflects in one's audience.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, whic…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, whic…
@TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, which is what they're refusing to do. It's why Pierre Kory's claims of being an "expert" on ivermectin mean nothing in the face of the abund
@tamachuo_law 新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の予防と治療のためのイベルメクチン https://t.co/inBF9zLvLd
RT @jason_willz1: @RonnieCoot Ivermectin has no efficacy for covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t…
@KimDotcom @RobertKennedyJr The most independent and trusted medical organization in the word https://t.co/l0ROg39nN2
RT @AtomsksSanakan: PaperOfTheDay https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/JNmXdZDiF4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Quality of clinical evidence a…
PaperOfTheDay https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/JNmXdZDiF4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Quality of clinical evidence and political justifications of ivermectin mass distribution of COVID-19 kits in eight Latin American countries" https://t.co/ihf5XLkZ7v h
@sigmashrink @jhn_steen @DrDavidNL @jorgje @MarionKoopmans @mauricedehond Many robust RCT prove ivm doesn't work for covid. https://t.co/3OobVyrDHU
@Mac_Gann @fusreedah @josepharthur @Timcast Doesn't help your argument any more than the others. Consider these https://t.co/k1mv8Y90l1 https://t.co/o7ygjPHrmF https://t.co/EHX0h0hyw8
@BillSyrjala @GeoffSchuler Did you read that? Even on that scam website not one of those studies says ivemectin has ANY impact on COVID 19. https://t.co/omdRMtRRwr
@ch_zimmer @PaulBieniasz Published evidence showed ivermectin didn't work for SARS-CoV-2. Conspiracists didn't like that, so they requested scientists' emails + twisted those emails to suit their preferred narrative. Guess what you're doing... https://t.
@GromCris @MathieuMolimard @SFPT_fr moi aussi, déjà dit ici https://t.co/BqO9JpTnwk vous arrivez vraiment a comparer 72 personne contre 7000 ?
@GromCris @MathieuMolimard @SFPT_fr une étude avec 72 patients... des qu'on regarde les meta analyse incluant plusieurs milliers de patients, bah tout de suite, ça marche plus https://t.co/ThU99Sezu4 https://t.co/5kW5pbJeQR
@Jenny_jones1978 @Nothv13 @mpc_xetts @KD2NFC @goddeketal @PeterHotez @DocDeezWhat @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 And it doesn’t work as a preventative either https://t.co/oFeouSLXSC
@LimitingThe @elonmusk @MdBreathe Ivermectin has no advantage for covid treatment if you make a meta analysis of the studies made and if you remove the bad made studies from it, like Cochrane did in June 22. As a result 11 studies habe been analyzed and n
@lawrie_dr I challenge you to debunk this https://t.co/SoKjsUnsG3
@CKellyUAP We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID‐19 or preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited. https://t.co/bhTIXhwvwS
@goddeketal @PeterHotez I don't trust the FDA because their system is too easy to sway by outsiders, but I do trust the NIH. "Ivermectin plus standard of care compared to standard of care plus/minus placebo probably has little or no effect on all‐cause mo
@coreyum @Endzone51 @BretWeinstein @PierreKory That's what truly systematic review and meta-analysis is designed to avoid. It's why the systematic Cochrane review finds no evidence of benefit and the selective criticisms of ivmmeta claim overwhelming evide
@trillionofcells @Thomas_Banacek @jonathanstea Vaccine efficacy is extremely well established (unless you're specifically/only talking about recent COVID-19 boosters lagging behind new variants where data are less clear). Meanwhile, more on ivermectin: h
RT @rt7683: @CKellyUAP Randomized trials prove neither hcq nor ivm work for covid. The study you cited is not an RCT https://t.co/4gui3BAWK…
RT @jason_willz1: @ionabryony @DiedSuddenly_ unvaccinated are dying at higher rates, from covid and all cause mortality. Ivermectin does no…
Daily reminder. 😑
RT @jason_willz1: @ionabryony @DiedSuddenly_ unvaccinated are dying at higher rates, from covid and all cause mortality. Ivermectin does no…
RT @jason_willz1: @ionabryony @DiedSuddenly_ unvaccinated are dying at higher rates, from covid and all cause mortality. Ivermectin does no…
RT @jason_willz1: @ionabryony @DiedSuddenly_ unvaccinated are dying at higher rates, from covid and all cause mortality. Ivermectin does no…
@c3c3b3b3a3a3 コクランです‼️ これ否定するの❔ https://t.co/txVzG7zwft
@hamataku55 全く効果がなく、死亡例のあるイベルメクチン⁉️ https://t.co/txVzG7yYpV
@RowdyKate2 @ThisNThatNews2 @HiddenPinky @fTavksE9oP34367 @k_eagar @VPrasadMDMPH Do yourself a favor this is a summary of all ivermectin trials to date and is on going it is updated regularly as info is emerging. The bottom half is in plain English. Of all
‼️‼️‼️
1/1 Aus aktuellem Anlass weise ich darauf hin, dass hier jegliche Versuche unterbunden und gemeldet werden, die hier Telegram Gruppen mit zweifelhaften Angeboten zu Ivermectin usw. andienern. DAS hat HIER NICHTS zu suchen! https://t.co/bwJvZQkGCy.
@SorenSchifter @steenstenloese @ProfJLundgren Her er et Cochrane review der indeholder analyse af 11 trials. De konkluderer Ivermectin ikke har nogen effekt, hverken mod mild eller svær sygdom: https://t.co/fU6zep8i0S. Så uanset om der er flere trials på
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox The FDA states currently available data doesnt show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The link is in…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox The FDA states currently available data doesnt show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The link is in…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes Shown repeatedly in higher-quality studies (ex: randomized controlle…
@VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes Shown repeatedly in higher-quality studies (ex: randomized controlled trials at lower risk of bias), ivermectin has no statistically significant benefit. Non-expert ideologues counting low-quality studies
RT @rogerca77506469: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID01019 https://t.co/KChbNPoAdS
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID01019 https://t.co/KChbNPoAdS
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox The FDA states currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The link is in…
@elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes Is seems like it has no, or low positive effect on COVID-19 https://t.co/NkHqOkt2Ip
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox The FDA states currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The link is in…
@Erwin3e @JochemBredewout En verder moet je misschien ook dit even lezen: https://t.co/zfBuM1aevQ
@CintiaBraganca_ @matematica_MIT @DRobertaLacerda Uma empresa norte americana na Bulgária? Que empresa? Pq na Bulgária? O ideal eh vc consultar instituições sérias, como a cochrane, que eh referência em metanálises. Leia isso aqui, o resultado eh triste. A
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
@MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.co/JjoLSaFoua https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/Yf7hq6jx7m
@Larrjusticiero @eorecsuf @delurens demuestra que lo que afirmas del covid fue invento. Y lee para que sirve la ivervectina el desparasitario intestinal para animales XD https://t.co/MY0GdaSXU8.
@ivermectin_team えーと、今は2022年4月ですか? ちなみにコクランレビューも2022年4月までを対照としていますがwww イベルメクチンはいったい何に効く薬なのか具体的に教えて頂けませんか? ①COVID-19 予防 ②COVID-19 ウイルス低減 ③COVID-19 症状緩和 ④COVID-19 重症化予防 どれ? https://t.co/xLYrNDCL8z
RT @jason_willz1: @ABtekmaster @patwebbjr ivermectin does not have efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials…
RT @jason_willz1: @ABtekmaster @patwebbjr ivermectin does not have efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials…
@DiaboliSem @Saikmedi @sciam This is embarrassing for you but
@BENT_N0T_BR0KEN @NoToAllGMOs @mpc_xetts The hits keep coming
RT @sudokuvariante: Hey @mintimetz, it looks like Together-IVM trial is extremely poorly designed, and the authors of this study guilty of…
RT @sudokuvariante: Hey @mintimetz, it looks like Together-IVM trial is extremely poorly designed, and the authors of this study guilty of…
Hey @mintimetz, it looks like Together-IVM trial is extremely poorly designed, and the authors of this study guilty of scientific misconduct. Could you please explain why this trial is rated as low RoB in the Cochrane review you co-authored? https://t.co/
@GogoJonnie @million_meal @jimeekay @Johnincarlisle @davideyoungmd Why do I need to sample every type of bullshit to understand its bullshit, when I can smell it from a 100 yards away. IVM for C19 is Bullshit (although it works well on helminths, which y
RT @Rhazelovitch: @insins31544458 Tes 100% d'études ont beaucoup de mal à se faire un chemin dans la littérature apparemment (que s'apelori…
@insins31544458 Tes 100% d'études ont beaucoup de mal à se faire un chemin dans la littérature apparemment (que s'apelorio "cherry picking"): https://t.co/bTCPkVJoIx https://t.co/ausqmOWFr3 Et ton étude miracle Medincell n'est ni publiée ni reviewée,on a
@Szymon49366484 @pamiechomeblog @AnnaSiarkowska @PiotrWitczak_ @AgnieszkaSzust3 @RzeczPacjenta @SolidarnaPolska @marcinwarchol „The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement.” Nieste
@Stefans_Tweety Der Pepi halt. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/c17c0rvYbC. https://t.co/nUQoS6ECPg
RT @jason_willz1: @BarryESharp hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin don't work for covid either, based on randomized controlled trials https:/…
RT @BarryESharp: Hydroxychloroquine was banned, shamed and ridiculed due to the fraudulent paper placed in @TheLancet by Surgisphere, only…
RT @BarryESharp: Hydroxychloroquine was banned, shamed and ridiculed due to the fraudulent paper placed in @TheLancet by Surgisphere, only…