@dr_phototherapy @_hatemi @tipsiztibbiyeli @TugceYamankaya @mehmetceyhan23 Bonus🤡 Ivermectin parazitik enfeksiyonları tedavi eder.Ivermectin'in,RCT'lere dayalı olarak COVID-19'u tedavi etme etkinliği yok. https://t.co/M4yKUK2giH Randomize https://t.co/bpj
RT @jason_willz1: @epimeme @TheChiefNerd @123Jsun123 @JakeeRoy Many RCT's demonstrate ivm does not work to treat or prevent COVID. c19ivm…
RT @jason_willz1: @epimeme @TheChiefNerd @123Jsun123 @JakeeRoy Many RCT's demonstrate ivm does not work to treat or prevent COVID. c19ivm…
RT @jason_willz1: @epimeme @TheChiefNerd @123Jsun123 @JakeeRoy Many RCT's demonstrate ivm does not work to treat or prevent COVID. c19ivm…
@dirktheuns Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did show benefit for ivermectin were in vitro or observational in nature. https://t.co/W7kL8z8V3N ht
@wgDmwgj これについて話すと親分と子分がGoogle、Yahooが闇の組織と関与しているという話に至るという話にならない方向に向かいます。 https://t.co/B6TV7PyKfe
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @thereal_truther @Ravarora1 @19joho @JosephFraiman You might want to consider asking him about his claims on ivermectin…
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
RT @jason_willz1: @TheChiefNerd Ivermectin treats parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCT's. This s…
@patriotes_93 Efficace principalement dans votre tête 🤷♂️ https://t.co/YwI4lqw6xc
@thereal_truther @Ravarora1 @19joho @JosephFraiman You might want to consider asking him about his claims on ivermectin + the grifters who peddled it. https://t.co/65IHDC28H1 https://t.co/wF3Ba3jyxk https://t.co/IKoitWqk8d https://t.co/173oqokGcO https:/
@MarkelGerald .......oder Prävention einer COVID-19-Infektion stützt. https://t.co/arN90J64Xs.
@DrDanLevy @NaturalNewsINWR @MdBreathe @US_FDA @cvspharmacy @Walgreens Cochrane reviews are a good place to start https://t.co/O3VJLnd6x3
@Earthciteyezen @JDCBurnhil @killer_marmot @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Genuinely embarrassed for you.
@CWK1983 @TheRealJoeSnow1 @SenRonJohnson @US_FDA Here’s another. https://t.co/2KuNg5klIy
@english_natal @Doctor_Cr @ABridgen The Cochrane review includes studies from different countries. Here is the reference list https://t.co/4nHoNHx5Da
@KevinFHalosFan @mwdumdei @DianneCallaha16 @RepMTG Not effective for preventing infection: https://t.co/GNg1KJh4fv
@OBSdeIII @pimb1986 @_CrypTony_ @patricksavalle @MarionKoopmans Ik had Pim al geantwoord.. daarna nooooit meer wat van m gehoord..😂😂
RT @Herrly5: @marlene4719 Imagine if we've been lied to all our lives😉 https://t.co/ivehWjrfDA. https://t.co/uZmXwmDuXn https://t.co/0Otuk…
RT @Herrly5: @marlene4719 Imagine if we've been lied to all our lives😉 https://t.co/ivehWjrfDA. https://t.co/uZmXwmDuXn https://t.co/0Otuk…
@thebadstats @BretWeinstein And ivermectin didn't work, of course. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/XIE273C6m3
@Goldspiracy @WaitingForPerot @DrSusanOliver1 Nope, and no amount JAQing off will make it so. https://t.co/173oqokGcO
Can physicians prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19? Yes. Should they? No. https://t.co/QL1i3aCUdS
@AlBowers1 @Kurt_P_M @MdBreathe @dedfromthevax @US_FDA @cvspharmacy @Walgreens This link cited the Cochrane collaboration which I clicked on, it said it wasn't effective, but it wasn't the most recent posting...the newer one backtracks a bit. https://t.co
@marlene4719 Imagine if we've been lied to all our lives😉 https://t.co/ivehWjrfDA. https://t.co/uZmXwmDuXn https://t.co/0Otukc4sOS https://t.co/BZ4340wSk5
@patricksavalle @EchoesOfSmiles @jeanerus @Mariba2puntnul Ik heb ook een lijstje onderzoeken die geen werking aantonen van HCQ en IVM…. Bronnen: https://t.co/JHa7Y8CYLl… https://t.co/JBQLajN6TD… https://t.co/ul30HTmoh1… https://t.co/kBaqgOy80A https://t.c
@pimb1986 @_CrypTony_ @patricksavalle @MarionKoopmans Maar goed; Hier een lijstje met peer reviewed onderzoeken die geen werking aantonen van HCQ en IVM…. Bronnen: https://t.co/AsISBtpfWU https://t.co/mPhbLjcg2X https://t.co/CQkIDuC7Hs https://t.co/KCyJtQ
RT @WideRangeThink: @SgVnYDTilrYxxpm それは2021年04月28日の記事。 その後、効果有りの論文は不正発覚して撤回。 峰宗太郎先生のまとめによると 効果が見られるとした論文は不正が発覚したものばかり。 それ以外は効果なし。 北里大学の治験で…
RT @WideRangeThink: @SgVnYDTilrYxxpm それは2021年04月28日の記事。 その後、効果有りの論文は不正発覚して撤回。 峰宗太郎先生のまとめによると 効果が見られるとした論文は不正が発覚したものばかり。 それ以外は効果なし。 北里大学の治験で…
@SgVnYDTilrYxxpm それは2021年04月28日の記事。 その後、効果有りの論文は不正発覚して撤回。 峰宗太郎先生のまとめによると 効果が見られるとした論文は不正が発覚したものばかり。 それ以外は効果なし。 北里大学の治験でも効果なし。 と完全に決着がついています。 https://t.co/qp9C9yIEsD https://t.co/kVGiw4dz31
@Vinman713 @ABridgen They might do that in the US, but then they think that chiropractic is suitable as health care. However, the publications weren't withdrawn, and show that ivermectin has little to no effect on COVID. https://t.co/Kjw0jtnAcB https://t
@Alexfloresmac @RDVSVNZLA @JulioRazona Dale, di lo tuyo y culpa a George Soros de financiar este estudio https://t.co/WyNHNGTYhH
@RDVSVNZLA @Alexfloresmac @JulioRazona Aquí uno de los más recientes: https://t.co/WyNHNGTYhH
@rrrrando @t2hen2rija @MMurusalu Ivermektiinil siiski ei ole mingit tõendust, et see covidit ennetada või ravida aitaks. https://t.co/LJtdhYS2rE Pealegi võiks selle diskussiooni selja taha jätta, kui meil nirmatrelviir+ritonaviiro näol on toimiv ravi olema
@Wim04789402 @Thundertothemax @MarkWendrich Wanneer u degelijk wetenschappelijk onderzoek betrekt kijk dan in de Cochrane! https://t.co/m5RuN09Wsp
@PapeThibaut @EtienneKlein @PhilippeMurer La référence scientifique de situe plutôt sur ce genre de plateforme. Pas sur les sites Internet alternatifs … https://t.co/Tmph8O3jra
@RDVSVNZLA @MariolySosaP Y aquí está la actualización del mismo estudio revisado por pares que demuestra justo lo contrario https://t.co/WyNHNGTYhH
@RDVSVNZLA @JulioRazona Gracias por la aclaración! Ahora encontré la versión actualizada y revisada del estudio que compartiste y sorpresa! Concluye que la ivermictina no sirve para nada 😉 https://t.co/WyNHNGTYhH
@RoxanneHoge @eekymom @19joho @brownstoneinst @MartinKulldorff @CDCgov "We all used a variety of treatments including HcQ, Ivermectin & Z pack." https://t.co/vBjaXYMnsL Telling that non-expert vaccine denialists often instead opt for failed treatments
@barcalnz @ColBurns1954 @ellymelly Full article here (warning >150 pages): https://t.co/DGAMl4kNou
RT @jason_willz1: @DrCHuber @AlexBerenson Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on RCTs. c19ivm has no exclusion/exclusion cri…
RT @jason_willz1: @iluminatibot Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials…
RT @jason_willz1: @BretWeinstein Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did s…
RT @jason_willz1: @BretWeinstein Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did s…
RT @jason_willz1: @BretWeinstein Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did s…
@SozeJay @headspaceman @StuartJRitchie I had referenced it before in the thread, but this is the Cochrane review on the topic. https://t.co/YRetMz9SXR
@headspaceman @StuartJRitchie Not all, but a troubling fraction of the RCTs are untrustworthy. Which is a shame. Cochrane analysis: https://t.co/ajNUjWHuwa . (And see https://t.co/iqBhN1u77L re that c19ivm site).
@violetkathyw @TrishSumner1 @VigilantFox You can’t prove a negative. I can provide a Cochran Review which is stronger evidence than one RCT. https://t.co/SGLeT6qayG
RT @WideRangeThink: (6/18) 2022年6月のコクランレビューでも効果なし。 https://t.co/UegI7qPGZ7 この後に公表された興和の治験での主要評価項目の統計的有意差なし。 https://t.co/c9g7BQhmtZ 公表までに長時…
RT @jason_willz1: @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials…
RT @jason_willz1: @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials…
RT @jason_willz1: @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials…
@marc_g_wathelet @olivesbts @CorinneReverbel Si il y en a cherchez bien. Alors pas très bien publiées pour cause, aucune étude sérieuse n'a été menée en prophylaxie. Le fait est qu'en prophylaxie il est bien difficile de déterminer l'adhésion au traitement
@ER_Korhola V. 2017 nämä julkaisut. Jos lääke olisi tehokas, varmasti käytettäisiin. Tässä on näyttö. Onko tuoreempaa? https://t.co/aNP5OU0eyO
@NKfreeSpeech @zwitscherhanne1 @maxarus @goddeketal This seems to be a preprint from 2021, why was it never peer reviewed? This is a more recent report (June 22) on Ivermectin, and it's effect on COVID https://t.co/bMtnSkjZpg
@Covid19Critical And according to this meta-analysis (which used proper technique) there was no benefit of ivermectin in treating or preventing COVID-19 🤷♂️. https://t.co/OBOMoqh7Sy https://t.co/hhHRmEymJK
RT @dr_jon_l: @Covid19Critical Thats weird, that's not what this high-quality meta-analysis says 🤔 https://t.co/OBOMoqgA30 https://t.co/f4…
@Covid19Critical Thats weird, that's not what this high-quality meta-analysis says 🤔 https://t.co/OBOMoqgA30 https://t.co/f4mSy6o4Wo
@gatewaypundit "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with COVID-19" --> https://t.co/N40XFBStdT
@LarryBoorstein @GYamey @DavidQuammen In response, more baseless conspiracism from the same non-expert contrarians that got other topics like ivermectin wrong. "Sorry incorrect Ivermectin has protective preventative properties also." https://t.co/2GL08DKD
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 5/ Re: "who abuses experts' private messages / emails from *before* they examine much evidence, to evade + be paranoid…
@RoyTyrrell1 @CamLangton @CKellyUAP Here’s a recent review of literature, where does it suggest IvM works? If you are happy to pay money for a placebo, that’s your business. Recommending to others is dangerous.They might believe it, delaying Rx’s that act
@drawandstrike Ivermectin is not an effective treatment for COVID-19 https://t.co/vrQRlRzFgM https://t.co/opCmCJ2g9t https://t.co/1q1NMGcgfu https://t.co/eVVZwZHf77 https://t.co/IziMU6SCwN https://t.co/iaORjaWgFB Evidence, not brainwashing!
@Chicago1Ray "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@BGatesIsaPyscho @VigilantFox "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@ChuckCallesto "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@leslibless "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@HopeRising19 "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@IbrahimReyesEsq "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@afshineemrani @RobertKennedyJr "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
@MdBreathe @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @BoydenGrayAssoc "For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that #ivermectin has **no** beneficial effect for people with #COVID19." --> https://t.co/N40XFBRVol
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @RisingTheHill Good illustration of what's said about Hill Rising: Credulous non-expert reporting with no fact-checkin…
@ChuckCallesto This is a systematic review that aggregated the available studies and found no significant benefit of Ivermectin on COVID-19. If you're not a physician or scientist who understands the science and how to interpret a study, then stop pretendi
@joshlbrooks @Samuel_Gregson It's because they don't do their homework on published evidence, and have no honest interest in doing so because that's not what their target audience (contrarians/conspiracists). Same pattern occurred on lab leak + other topi
@RisingTheHill Good illustration of what's said about Hill Rising: Credulous non-expert reporting with no fact-checking, meant to make money off a gullible contrarian/conspiracist audience. Example: weak pushback on RFK Jr.'s ivermectin tripe https://t.
@gsjphd @SolomonRDavid The Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis showed a FORTY PERCENT reduction in all-cause mortality. That is huge. https://t.co/PwUSbPVltM
RT @jason_willz1: @ionabryony @DiedSuddenly_ unvaccinated are dying at higher rates, from covid and all cause mortality. Ivermectin does no…
RT @jason_willz1: @GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD randomized controlled trials show no benefit https:/…
@PierreKory Ivermectin was very effective for your wallet. Not so much against the COVID. https://t.co/yemEtxsdiA